N. Kamata et al., ESTIMATING THE DENSITY OF BEECH CATERPILLAR, QUADRICALCARIFERA-PUNCTATELLA, BY FRASS DROP SAMPLES, JARQ. Japan Agricultural Research Quarterly, 28(3), 1994, pp. 217-223
The purpose of this study was to investigate frass production of the b
eech caterpillar, Quadricalcarifera punctatella (Motschulsky) (Lep., N
otodontidae) and to develop a method for estimating the field density
of its last instar larvae from fallen pellets. About 90% of larval fra
ss by weight was produced during the last instar period. The number of
pellets falling to the forest floor was a better parameter for densit
y estimation than weight. Pellets with a width of more than 1.8 mm wer
e considered to have been produced during the last instar. The number
of pellets produced per day or per hour in the last instar was influen
ced by many factors, especially by temperature; however, the number of
pellets produced during the last instar was relatively constant (ca.
630) regardless of temperature and photoperiod. The number of last ins
tar pellets dropping per m2 during the season was measured in traps an
d divided by 630 to estimate the density of the last instars. This met
hod, based on the Southwood-Jepson graphical method, is very simple bu
t reliable because the estimates are not influenced by ambient tempera
ture, and because the total number of falling pellets can be estimated
correctly by setting traps throughout the entire season. Although som
e frass was destroyed and washed away from the trap, we concluded that
no compensation was necessary for field application since the decreas
e was minimal. The density was underestimated when severe defoliation
occurred. In such a situation, the density (Y) should be estimated fro
m the following equation: Y = 0.9881log10 X + 0.898, where X is the ma
ximum value of the frass drop per day (g.dw/m2/day). Only five traps (
1 m2 each) were required with a 0.2 ratio of tolerance limit at the 70
% confidence level. Such a small number of samples were necessary beca
use the method used counts of frass pellets rather than individuals; l
arval mobility and wind homogenized the spatial distribution of fallin
g frass.