P. Loisel et al., MANAGEMENT OF OCCUPATIONAL BACK PAIN - THE SHERBROOKE MODEL - RESULTSOF A PILOT AND FEASIBILITY STUDY, Occupational and environmental medicine, 51(9), 1994, pp. 597-602
Objectives-The aim was to combat occurrence of chronic occupational ba
ck pain.Methods-A multidisciplinary model to manage back pain that inc
ludes both clinical and ergonomic approaches has been developed. Early
detection,early clinical and ergonomic evaluations, and early active
treatment make up the cornerstone of management. Detection of cases st
arts after four weeks of absence from work. An ergonomic intervention
is implemented at six weeks. A medical specialist is involved at eight
weeks. If return to work is not possible; after 12 weeks, a functiona
l recovery therapy followed by a therapeutic return to work is impleme
nted. A multidisciplinary team. decides if return to original or modif
ied work is possible or if vocational rehabilitation is necessary. Thi
s model has been implemented by the investigators in the Sherbrooke (Q
uebec, Canada) area, and is presently being evaluated through a random
ised trial in 31 industrial settlements (about 20 000 workers). A clus
ter randomisation of industries and workers will allow separate testin
g of ergonomic and clinical interventions.Results-One year after imple
mentation, 31 of 35 of the eligible industrial sites participated in t
he study and 79 of 88 of the eligible workers affected by recent back
pain had agreed to participate. Ergonomic and clinical interventions h
ave been implemented as planned. Only three workers dropped out. Hence
this global clinical and ergonomic management programme has been show
n to be feasible in a general population. Conclusion-A global manageme
nt programme of back pain joining ergonomic and clinical intervention
with a multidisciplinary approach has not been tested yet. Linking the
se two strategies in a same multidisciplinary team represents a system
ic approach to this multifactorial ailment. During the first year of t
his trial we did not find any conflict between these two interventions
from the employer's or worker's point of view.