Introduction. The microbiological identification of onychomycosis may
be uncertain as some fungi growing in culture from this material are n
ot necessarily pathogen and invasive. Conversely, the negativity of a
culture is not rare even when fungi are seen by microscopy. Materials
and methods. We compared the information brought by standard histologi
cal examination, immunohistochemistry and in vivo confocal microscopy.
Results. The histological examination of nails is of importance in th
is pathology. We present a laboratory technique that proves to be easy
and rapid. We report diagnostic criteria allowing the distinction bet
ween dermatophytes, yeasts and non-dermatophyte molds. The standard mi
croscopic examination may further be improved by immunohistochemistry
using some antibodies to fungi. In vivo confocal microscopy is a techn
ique for the future. The dermatologist will be able to see fungi in th
e nail at the clinical examination, without any sampling or peculiar p
reparation. Conclusion. The histological examination is a routine tech
nique useful for defining the nature and localization of fungi in the
nail plate. Immunohistochemistry applied to onychomycosis is an experi
mental approach bringing prominent informations about the identificati
on of fungi. In vivo confocal microscopy is a door opened to the futur
e.