The Public Service 2000 exercise and the June 1993 government reorgani
zation are reviewed in the context of a decade of centrally driven ini
tiatives to improve the management and productivity of the federal pub
lic service. The work of the Tresury Board Secretariat during these in
itiatives is described and the changes in its modus operandi and struc
ture are outlined. It is suggested that the most important shortcoming
in the PS 2000 exercise was the failure to reconcile the renewal them
e with the continuing requirement for reductions in operating budgets,
and to set out the implications of expenditure restraint for the size
and nature of the public service in the 1990s. What is needed for the
next stage of public service renewal is not a high-profile, service-w
ide initiative, but a ''realistic management posture'' that takes adeq
uate account of continuing fiscal restraint, arbitrariness in expendit
ure reduction, impact on services, technological change, limited appli
cability of private sector techniques, efficacy of centrally imposed c
ontrols, relationship between employment security and renewal, and fin
ally, compensation determination.