L. Ratschbacher et al., A NEUTRON GONIOMETER STUDY OF THE PREFERRED ORIENTATION OF CALCITE INFINE-GRAINED DEEP-SEA CARBONATE, Sedimentary geology, 89(3-4), 1994, pp. 315-324
In weakly indurated, nannofossil-rich, deep-sea carbonates compression
al wave velocity is up to twice as fast parallel to bedding than norma
l to it. It has been suggested that this anisotropy is due to alignmen
t of calcite c-axis perpendicular to the shields of coccoliths and shi
eld deposition parallel to bedding. This hypothesis was tested by meas
uring the preferred orientation (fabric) of calcite c-axis in acoustic
anisotropic, calcareous DSDP sediment samples by X-ray goniometry, an
d it was found that the maximum c-axis concentrations are by far too l
ow to explain the anisotropies. The X-ray method is subject to a numbe
r of uncertainties due to preparatory and technical shortcomings in we
akly indurated rocks. The most serious weaknesses are: sample preparat
ion, volume of measured sample (fraction of a mm3), beam defocusing an
d background intensity corrections, combination of incomplete pole fig
ures, and necessity of recalculation of the c-axis orientations from o
ther crystallographic directions. Goniometry using thermal neutrons ov
ercomes most of these difficulties, but it is time consuming. We test
the interferences made about velocity anisotropy by X-ray studies abou
t the concentration of c-axes in deep-sea carbonates by employing neut
ron texture goniometry to eight DSDP samples comprising mostly nannofo
ssil material. Fabric and sonic velocity were determined directly on t
he core specimens, thus from the same rock volume and requiring no pre
paration. The c-axis orientation is obtained directly from the [0006]
calcite diffraction peak without corrections. The fabrics are clearly
defined, but weak (1.1 to 1.86 times uniform) with the maximum about n
ormal to bedding. They have crudely orthorhombic symmetry, but are not
axisymmetric around the bedding normal. The observed c-axis intensiti
es, although higher than determined by the X-ray method on other sampl
es, are by far too low to explain the observed acoustic anisotropies.