This research focuses on the aggregate effects of the House Banking Sc
andal on the 1992 elections for the U.S. House of Representatives. Whi
le many commentators felt the scandal would transform the House of Rep
resentatives through massive displacement of members, we argue that th
e literature on scandals in Congress should have made us more cautious
in our prognostications. We focus on three different stages of reelec
tion for incumbents and conclude that the House Banking Scandal had on
ly a nominal effect on those who wrote bad checks.