Science, technology and innovation each represent a successively large
r category of activities which are highly interdependent but distinct.
Science contributes to technology in at least six ways: (1) new knowl
edge which serves as a direct source of ideas for new technological po
ssibilities; (2) source of tools and techniques for more efficient eng
ineering design and a knowledge base for evaluation of feasibility of
designs; (3) research instrumentation, laboratory techniques and analy
tical methods used in research that eventually find their way into des
ign or industrial practices, often through intermediate disciplines; (
4) practice of research as a source for development and assimilation o
f new human skills and capabilities eventually useful for technology;
(5) creation of a knowledge base that becomes increasingly important i
n the assessment of technology in terms of its wider social and enviro
nmental impacts; (6) knowledge base that enables more efficient strate
gies of applied research, development, and refinement of new technolog
ies. The converse impact of technology on science is of at least equal
importance: (1) through providing a fertile source of novel scientifi
c questions and thereby also helping to justify the allocation of reso
urces needed to address these questions in an efficient and timely man
ner, extending the agenda of science; (2) as a source of otherwise una
vailable instrumentation and techniques needed to address novel and mo
re difficult scientific questions more efficiently. Specific examples
of each of these two-way interactions are discussed. Because of many i
ndirect as well as direct connections between science and technology,
the research portfolio of potential social benefit is much broader and
more diverse than would be suggested by looking only at the direct co
nnections between science and technology.