Regional systems, increased competition, and environmental imperatives
are forcing a reallocation of state and federal regulatory responsibi
lities for the US electric power sector. The great extent of regional
diversity in the sector raises a policy relevant empirical question. I
s this diversity due to choice or circumstance? This paper finds circu
mstance to be a more significant determinant of fundamental performanc
e than choice, but also finds evidence that decisions at the margin re
flect the diverse preferences of regional policies. This suggests a co
ntinued role for (more responsive) state level regulation in order to
satisfy diverse preferences. Uncertainty about the optimal end-point o
f restructuring reinforces the value of continued state regulatory exp
erimentation.