J. Ferry et L. Rankin, LOW-COST, PATIENT ACCEPTABLE, LOCAL ANALGESIA APPROACH TO GYNECOLOGICAL OUTPATIENT SURGERY A REVIEW OF 817 CONSECUTIVE PROCEDURES, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 34(4), 1994, pp. 453-456
The objective of this study was to evaluate safety, cost effectiveness
and patient acceptability, of performing a wide variety of gynaecolog
ical procedures, including endometrial resections, in a clinic using o
nly local analgesia. Eight hundred and seventeen consecutive gynaecolo
gical procedures were performed under local analgesia only, with no se
dation, including endometrial resections, cone biopsies, terminations
of pregnancy, hysteroscopies, and local vaginal and plastic vulval pro
cedures, as well as many combined procedures (figure 1) in a day-surge
ry ward annexe in the Department of Gynaecology, St John's District Ge
neral Hospital, Chelmsford Essex. The main outcome measures were patei
nt acceptability, safety and encountered side-effects of procedures pe
rformed under local analgesia as well as evaluation of cost-effectiven
ess and reduction in theatre waiting list times. A high degree of safe
ty and patient acceptability was achieved, with other considerable ben
efits being short waiting times and much quicker recovery. The only co
mplications were from the endometrial resection group, with only 8 (3.
6%) of these requiring intravenous sedation intraoperatively, and 6 (2
.7%) requiring overnight admission. No transfers to theatre during any
procedure occurred. Savings per procedure, in cost and in patient's t
ime, were very considerable. Conclusion: The local analgesia approach
for a wide variety of gynaecological procedures in a combined outpatie
nt theatre is safe and is highly acceptable to patients. There are als
o considerable benefits in cost and patient convenience, with a reduct
ion in operating list waiting time, which in the current economic clim
ate are worth considering.