Ph. Ng et P. Hogston, EARLY DISCHARGE FOLLOWING MAJOR GYNECOLOGICAL SURGERY, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 34(4), 1994, pp. 474-476
This prospective study was to assess the safety and acceptability to p
atients of early discharge after major gynaecological surgery. Selecti
ve patients who fulfilled certain criteria were offered early discharg
e after their operations. Forty patients were discharged within 72 hou
rs. Fourteen of them had undergone abdominal hysterectomy, 5 with a mi
d-line incision; 13 had vaginal hysterectomy; 9 laparoscopy and laparo
tomy for ectopic pregnancy; 3 laparotomy for ovarian surgery and 1 a M
anchester repair. The patients were discharged home on average 2.4 day
s after their operations. All were satisfied with their pain relief at
home. There were 4 postdischarge complications. Two had superficial d
rip-site phlebitis, 1 a possible urinary tract infection and 1 a wound
abscess. There was only 1 readmission 2 weeks post discharge for cons
tipation. Thirty-one out of 40 (77.5%) of the patients had expressed t
hat the home environment was more conductive to speedy recovery and 92
.5% of the patients would choose early discharge again if given the op
tion.