An open-ended questionnaire was administered to 20 patients using the
Nucleus multichannel cochlear implant and 21 patients using the Inerai
d multichannel cochlear implant. Before surgery, they were asked to li
st the advantages and disadvantages that they expected from their coch
lear implant. Advantages were expected in the categories of: (1) speec
h perception when speechreading can be used (65%); (2) environmental s
ound perception (58%); (3) psychological effects (14%); (4) speech per
ception when speechreading cannot be used (49%); (5) lifestyle and soc
ial effects (42%); and (6) speech production (5%). Disadvantages were
expected in: (1) equipment malfunction (42%); (2) environmental sound
perception (28%); (3) speech perception when speechreading can be used
(7%); (4) psychological effects (24%); (5) speech perception when spe
echreading is not used (7%); and (6) lifestyle and social effects (7%)
. Concerns were also raised about the risk of surgery (9%). After seve
ral months (4-60 mo) of using their implant, patients were asked to li
st the advantages and disadvantages that they actually experienced. Ad
vantages were reported in the categories of: (1) speech perception whe
n speechreading can be used (86%); (2) environmental sound perception
(79%); (3) psychological effects (49%); (4) speech perception when spe
echreading cannot be used (56%); (5) lifestyle and social effects (40%
); (6) speech production (14%); and (7) the reduction of tinnitus (7%)
. Disadvantages were reported in: (1) equipment malfunction (54%); (2)
environmental sound perception (53%); (3) speech perception when spee
chreading can be used (26%); (4) psychological effects (12%); (5) spee
ch perception when speechreading is not used (21%); and (6) lifestyle
and social effects (9%). Concerns were also noted about the cost of su
rgery (14%). Thirty patients had tinnitus preoperatively. Without hear
ing sound through the implant, 70 percent of these indicated that the
cochlear implant had a positive effect on their tinnitus. When listeni
ng to speech through the implant, 83 percent reported that their tinni
tus was reduced.