Traditionally, scholars have noted the predominance of lawyers serving
in staff support positions and as elected members of the United State
s Congress. This article explores yet another aspect of the legislativ
e-judicial connection, namely, the roles of the Senate Legal Counsel a
nd the General Counsel in the House of Representatives. Based on inter
views, historical documents and court submissions, I examine the devel
opment of the offices with particular attention to their work in prote
cting the interests of both individual members of Congress and the ins
titution in the judicial arena. In conclusion, I argue that the increm
ental development of the General Counsel's office and the lack of form
al rules and procedures governing its activity have given rise to part
isan conflict over the office's role as the legal voice for the House
of Representatives, a conflict that has not been evidenced in the stat
utorily-based office of the Senate Legal Counsel.