EFFECTS OF INTRAABDOMINAL CO2 INSUFFLATION IN THE PIGLET

Citation
Aj. Graham et al., EFFECTS OF INTRAABDOMINAL CO2 INSUFFLATION IN THE PIGLET, Journal of pediatric surgery, 29(9), 1994, pp. 1276-1280
Citations number
16
Categorie Soggetti
Pediatrics,Surgery
ISSN journal
00223468
Volume
29
Issue
9
Year of publication
1994
Pages
1276 - 1280
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-3468(1994)29:9<1276:EOICII>2.0.ZU;2-0
Abstract
Adult intraabdominal surgery performed with the minimal-access techniq ue has created a revolution in surgery. This technique has remained la rgely unused for pediatric surgical procedures because of concerns reg arding its safety and efficacy. Presently, intraabdominal insufflation of CO2 is the preliminary step to performing minimal access surgery. In this study, an animal model was developed to determine the effects of intraabdominal CO2 insufflation in the infant. Eight piglets (4 to 6 kg; 14 to 19 days of age) were instrumented under fentanyl anesthesi a to allow measurement of arterial blood pressure (BP), central venous pressure (CVP), heart rate (HR), cardiac index (CI), inferior vena ca va pressure (IVCp), inferior vena cava flow (IVCf), mediastinal pressu re (Mp), partial pressure of CO2 (PaCO2), and minute ventilation (V-E) at baseline and during 1 hour of CO2 insufflation to a pressure of 15 mm Hg and again when ventilation was increased to control PaCO2 level s. Continuous recording of data allowed time-course analysis of 15-min ute blocks to determine the rate of change of measured variables. A se cond group of 6 piglets (4 to 6 kg) underwent the same instrumentation , but their baseline values were compared with those during N2O insuff lation to isolate the effects of increased intraabdominal pressure. Du ring CO2 insufflation alone. PaCO2 increased by 31% (P < .0001). This increase occurred within the first 15 minutes of insufflation and then remained stable. The increase was likely the result of increased CO2 absorption from the peritoneal cavity because V-E was unchanged. CO2 i nsufflation alone was associated with increases of 10% in CI (P = .02) , 29% in CVP (P = .01). and 17% in BP (P < .0001), and no change in sy stemic vascular resistance (SVR) and IVCf. In contrast, when PaCO2 was controlled by increased ventilation, there was no significant change in CI, increases of 7% in SVR (P = .02), 57% in CVP (P = .001), and 7% in BP (P = .01), and a 22% decrease in IVCf (P = .04). N2O insufflati on resulted in no significant change in CI, increases of 22% in SVR (P = .01), 35% in CVP (P = .01), and 16% in BP (P = .005), and a 25% dec rease in IVCf (P = .02). CO2 insufflation is associated with significa nt CO2 absorption and increased myocardial work in the piglet model. C opyright (C) 1994 by W.B. Saunders Company