To evaluate the effects of styrene exposure on learning, adult male Lo
ng-Evans rats learned repeated reversals of a spatial discrimination t
ask. Styrene monomer (50% vol/vol in corn oil) was administered by gav
age to groups of eight rats at 500 mg/kg/day, 5 days/week, for 8 weeks
in Experiments (Exps) I and II (total dose = 20.0 g/kg) or for 1, 3,
5, or 8 weeks in Exp III (total dose = 2.5, 7.5, 12.5, or 20.0 g/kg).
Control rats received corn oil vehicle for 8 weeks. Reversal training
began 8 (Exp I), 10 (Exp II), or 32 (Exp III) weeks after termination
of dosing. In Exp I, an instrumental (IN) schedule was used, under whi
ch rats received food after each presentation of a ''positive'' respon
se lever (S+) only if they had made at least one response during that
presentation of S+. In Exps II and III, an automaintenance (AU) schedu
le was used, under which rats received food after every presentation o
f S+, regardless of responding. In all experiments, a second manipulan
dum (S degrees) was presented randomly in time with respect to S+ and
food delivery. A discrimination ratio (DR) was calculated as the propo
rtion of total responses on S+ in each block of 10 trials. A reversal
involved switching the reward values of S+ and S degrees. Serial rever
sal learning was quantified in terms of trials to criterion. Reversal
learning improved similarly in control and treated rats trained under
the IN schedule, whereas treated rats trained under the AU schedule fa
iled to improve as much as controls. Reversal learning of some styrene
-treated AU rats in Exp III continued to be impaired for >1 year after
treatment. Increased responding on S degrees featured prominently in
the behavioral effect of styrene. An IN schedule requiring suppression
of S degrees responses for food in Exp III revealed a clear deficit i
n rats exposed to styrene. Not all treated rats were affected by styre
ne; nevertheless, changes in the affected individuals were as large as
those previously observed after trimethyltin-induced lesions of the C
NS. The incidence of impairment was not related to the total dose of s
tyrene given, suggesting the action of other, undetermined factors aff
ecting individual sensitivity to styrene.