Jw. Schofield et al., TEACHERS, COMPUTER TUTORS, AND TEACHING - THE ARTIFICIALLY INTELLIGENT TUTOR AS AN AGENT FOR CLASSROOM CHANGE, American educational research journal, 31(3), 1994, pp. 579-607
This article documents, explores, and explains a paradox-that students
who assert that a teacher provides better help than an artificially i
ntelligent computer-based tutor nonetheless prefer using the tutor to
learning in a more traditional manner and appear to learn more while d
oing so. An intensive qualitative study of eight classrooms using the
tutors as well as control and comparison classrooms suggests three fac
tors that account for this seeming inconsistency. First, rather than r
eplacing the teacher, the tutor provided an additional resource for st
udents. Second, using the tutors allowed teachers to provide more indi
vidualized help. Third, students using the tutors had more control ove
r the kind and amount of help they received from the teacher, with hel
ping interactions becoming more private and potentially less embarrass
ing. None of these changes were envisioned by the tutor's developers,
highlighting the importance of exploring the unintended effects of tec
hnology on classroom functioning.