The questioning of the nineteenth century baseline for anthropogenic c
ontributions to global warming is important for its role in a wider de
bate about the ''framing'' of this problem between the more-developed
and less-developed countries of the world. An analysis of this debate
raises such potentially important questions as: (1) How do historical/
developmental differences among nations affect global warming? (2) How
does the prior history of one nation affect the subsequent history of
another with respect to global warming? And (3), what are the consequ
ences of the separation in time (and space) of the capacity to exacerb
ate versus mitigate global warming? The larger question underlying all
of these is: What is the relationship between differences in national
histories, the problem of global warming, and the development of a gl
obal system capable of addressing it?