O. Aynaud et al., PENILE INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA - SPECIFIC CLINICAL-FEATURES CORRELATE WITH HISTOLOGIC AND VIROLOGICAL FINDINGS, Cancer, 74(6), 1994, pp. 1762-1767
Background. To evaluate the existence of the morphologic features spec
ific for penile intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN), 1000 male sexual part
ners of women with genital condyloma or intraepithelial neoplasia were
studied. Methods. Ninety-two patients who presented with lesions sugg
esting intraepithelial neoplasia (pigmented or leukoplastic papules, k
eratinized condylomata, or erythroplastic macules) underwent biopsy fo
r histologic and virologic studies. Results. Histologic results showed
penile intraepithelial neoplasia in 93% of the specimens. Human papil
lomavirus (HPV) DNA from potentially oncogenic papillomaviruses was de
tected in 75% of patients with Grade I PIN, in 93% of patients with Gr
ade II PIN, and in all patients with Grade III PIN. Uncircumcised and
circumcised men showed the same rate (52% vs. 45%; odds ratio [OR] = 1
.3; 95% confidence interval, 0.97-1.73) of HPV-associated lesions, whe
reas the rate of PIN was significantly higher in uncircumcised men tha
n in circumcised men (10% vs. 6%; OR = 1.77; 95% confidence interval,
1.02-3.07). The mean age of patients with Grade III PIN was 7 years ol
der then the mean age of patients with Grade I PIN, which suggests a s
tep progression similar to that of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Conclusion. Morphology seems to be a specific-enough indicator of PIN
, More data are needed to determine whether treatment of PIN may contr
ibute to preventing cervical or penile cancer. If so, the morphologic
criteria here described will be clinically useful.