S. Eustace et al., HALLUX-VALGUS, 1ST METATARSAL PRONATION AND COLLAPSE OF THE MEDIAL LONGITUDINAL ARCH - A RADIOLOGICAL CORRELATION, Skeletal radiology, 23(3), 1994, pp. 191-194
In a previous study we developed a model to assess first metatarsal pr
onation based on the position of the inferior tuberosity of its base a
nd showed a significant relationship between first metatarsal pronatio
n and the intermetatarsal angle (r = 0.69, p<0.001). The present study
was undertaken to correlate first metatarsal pronation with the heigh
t of the medial longitudinal arch in an attempt to define the clinical
significance of this new finding. The weight-bearing anteroposterior
and lateral radiographs of the feet of 50 patients (100 feet; 36 femal
es patients of mean age 38 years, 14 males patients of mean age 40 yea
rs) were reviewed, and in each case, the patient's age, sex, intermeta
tarsal angle, amount of first metatarsal pronation and medial longitud
inal arch angle were recorded by independent observers. A significant
relationship was demonstrated between first metatarsal pronation and t
he height of the medial longitudinal arch (r = 0.93, p<0.0001). Less m
arked association was observed between intermetatarsal angles and firs
t metatarsal pronation (r = 0.71, p<0.001). Multivariate analysis of p
atient age, sex, intermetatarsal angle and medial longitudinal arch an
gle against metatarsal pronation showed that the single most dominant
variable affecting metatarsal pronation was the height of the medial l
ongitudinal arch.