BRONCHIAL RESPONSIVENESS IN CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS - A COMPARISON BETWEEN PREVIOUSLY ASTHMATIC, CURRENTLY ASTHMATIC, AND NORMAL SUBJECTS

Citation
Kk. Hansen et al., BRONCHIAL RESPONSIVENESS IN CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS - A COMPARISON BETWEEN PREVIOUSLY ASTHMATIC, CURRENTLY ASTHMATIC, AND NORMAL SUBJECTS, The Journal of asthma, 31(2), 1994, pp. 99-107
Citations number
NO
Categorie Soggetti
Respiratory System",Allergy
Journal title
ISSN journal
02770903
Volume
31
Issue
2
Year of publication
1994
Pages
99 - 107
Database
ISI
SICI code
0277-0903(1994)31:2<99:BRICAA>2.0.ZU;2-G
Abstract
The aim of this study was to examine the degree of bronchial responsiv eness in previously asthmatic subjects. Of 253 patients, born within 1 964-1974, followed in the pediatric department at the University hospi tal in Copenhagen, 224 subjects (89%) were successfully contacted by t elephone; of these 195 complained of persistent asthma and 29 (13%) ha d had no asthmatic symptoms for at least 2 years. On the basis of the degree of respiratory symptoms, 58 individuals were examined at the ou tpatient clinic. Of these, (1) 19 were previously asthmatics, (2) 20 h ad current mild asthma, and (3) 19 had current severe asthma. Furtherm ore, 19 healthy individuals, age-matched with the preceding asthmatic subjects, were selected as controls. In all subjects, skin prick tests , lung function tests, and bronchial challenge tests with inhaled hist amine and bronchodilator were performed. Furthermore, the subjects mea sured their peak expiratory flow (PEF) twice daily during a period of 4 weeks. Of the 39 current asthmatic subjects, 82% had a PC20 less-tha n-or-equal-to 8 mg/ml, whereas all previously asthmatic subjects and t he controls had a PC20 > 8 mg/ml. The degree of bronchial responsivene ss as indicated by the dose-response slope (DRS), the percentage chang e in forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1) per inhaled mumol of his tamine, was found to be significantly higher in previously asthmatic p atients (median logDRS 0.1 DELTA%FEV1/mumol) than in controls (median logDRS -0.4 DELTA%FEV1/mumol) (p < 0.001). Furthermore previously asth matic subjects had significantly increased change in FEV1 after inhala tion of bronchodilator and peak expiratory flow variability compared t o controls. These findings suggest that apparently asymptomatic previo usly asthmatic subjects have increased airway variability.