Y. Kaji et al., HISTOPATHOLOGY OF UTERINE CERVICAL-CARCINOMA - DIAGNOSTIC COMPARISON OF ENDORECTAL SURFACE COIL AND STANDARD BODY COIL MRI, Journal of computer assisted tomography, 18(5), 1994, pp. 785-792
Objective: We compared body coil (BC) MR images and endorectal surface
coil (ERC) images with respect to the visualization of the cervix and
adjacent tissues and the histopathologic correlations of the imaging
findings. Materials and Methods: Twenty-one patients with cervical car
cinoma underwent MRI using both coils for evaluation of the cervix and
adjacent tissues. In all patients, surgical confirmation of the diagn
osis was obtained after imaging. Results: The ERC images were superior
to BC images for visualization of the cervix, parametrium, anterior v
aginal wall, and posterior bladder wall (p < 0.005). The accuracy of d
etecting parametrial invasion by ERC and BC imaging was, respectively,
95 and 79% (p < 0.05), while the differences of accuracy between BC a
nd ERC imaging were not statistically significant in staging or in ass
essing for invasion to corpus, vagina, bladder, and rectum. All the fa
lse-positive sites of parametrial invasion on BC images were diagnosed
correctly on ERC images. Conclusion: Endorectal surface coil imaging
is useful in assessing the extent of cervical carcinoma, especially pa
rametrial invasion, because it can delineate the tumor and the normal
tissues in detail.