This article examines both the shareholder wealth effects of employee
stock ownership plans (ESOPs) announced by firms subject to takeover p
ressure and the takeover incidence of targets with and without ESOPs.
Although we do not find that defensive ESOPs significantly reduce shar
eholder wealth on average, we identify two factors-the change in manag
erial and employee ownership due to the ESOP and the simultaneous anno
uncement of other defensive tactics-that are associated with negative
stock price reactions. We find that ESOPs are strong deterrents to tak
eover. ESOP targets that are acquired earn higher returns than targets
without ESOPs, but the difference is not statistically significant.