ANIMALS PREDISPOSED TO DEVELOP AMPHETAMINE SELF-ADMINISTRATION SHOW HIGHER SUSCEPTIBILITY TO DEVELOP CONTEXTUAL CONDITIONING OF BOTH AMPHETAMINE-INDUCED HYPERLOCOMOTION AND SENSITIZATION
C. Jodogne et al., ANIMALS PREDISPOSED TO DEVELOP AMPHETAMINE SELF-ADMINISTRATION SHOW HIGHER SUSCEPTIBILITY TO DEVELOP CONTEXTUAL CONDITIONING OF BOTH AMPHETAMINE-INDUCED HYPERLOCOMOTION AND SENSITIZATION, Brain research, 657(1-2), 1994, pp. 236-244
It has been shown that rats, like humans, display individual differenc
es in the propensity to develop psychostimulant self-administration. A
nimals showing the highest locomotor reactivity to novelty (HRs: High
Responders) are more prone to develop amphetamine self-administration
than rats having a low locomotor response to novelty (LRs: Low Respond
ers). The present study was designed to ascertain whether individual d
ifferences are also present in the conditioning of drug effects, a pro
cess involved in the maintenance of addiction. After pairing the drug
effect with a particular set of environmental cues, only HRs showed co
nditioned hyperlocomotion and environment-specific sensitization to th
e effect of amphetamine. Unconditioned sensitization was, however, obs
erved in LRs but not in HRs. The environment-specific sensitization di
sappeared on extinction of the conditioned hyperlocomotion in HRs, ind
icating that conditioning facilitates the expression of sensitization.
In contrast, an inhibitory influence of conditioning on sensitization
emerged from the analysis of the same results over all the experiment
al groups, without taking individual differences into account. In conc
lusion, our results shaw that: (i) locomotor reactivity to novelty pre
dicts both vulnerability to develop self-administration and contextual
conditioning of drug effects, which suggests that the two phenomena a
re two related features and that conditioning plays an important role
not only in the maintenance of drug intake but also in its development
; (ii) conditioned and unconditioned sensitization can be developed se
parately in different individuals which suggests that they are indepen
dent phenomena; (iii) analysis of individual differences is relevant t
o pharmacological studies, especially with respect to drugs of abuse.