One of the key factors which limits the use of neural networks in many
industrial applications has been the difficulty of demonstrating that
a trained network will continue to generate reliable outputs once it
is in routine use. An important potential source of errors is novel in
put data; that is, input data which differ significantly from the data
used to train the network. The author investigates the relationship b
etween the degree of novelty of input data and the corresponding relia
bility of the outputs from the network. He describes a quantitative pr
ocedure for assessing novelty, and demonstrates its performance by usi
ng an application which involves monitoring oil flow in multiphase pip
elines.