L. Bungartz et H. Niemann, ASSESSMENT OF THE PRESENCE OF A DOMINANT FOLLICLE AND SELECTION OF DAIRY-COWS SUITABLE FOR SUPEROVULATION BY A SINGLE ULTRASOUND EXAMINATION, Journal of Reproduction and Fertility, 101(3), 1994, pp. 583-591
The physiological significance of the dominant follicle ( > 9 mm in di
ameter in a growing phase; stable for < 3 days) for the superovulatory
response in 117 lactating Holstein Friesian dairy cows was investigat
ed. The presence or absence of a dominant follicle was determined retr
ospectively by analysing videotapes of follicular growth in all the ov
aries. Superovulation was induced by 28 mg Armour units (400 mg NIH-FS
H-P1) of FSH (Folltropin(TM)) administered either twice or once a day
i.m. over 4 days in a decreasing regimen or as a single injection s.c.
Donors were scanned daily from day 3 after the oestrus preceding supe
rovulation until embryo recovery. In Expt 1 donors superovulated (two
times a day for 4 days) in the absence of a dominant follicle yielded
more corpora lutea (11.7 +/- 0.9 versus 4.7 +/- 1.1, P < 0.01), ova an
d embryos (8.2 +/- 1.2 versus 2.8 +/- 1.0, P < 0.01) and transferable
embryos (5.0 +/- 1.0 versus 2.1 +/- 0.9, P < 0.05) compared with donor
s treated in the presence of a dominant follicle. In Expts 2 and 3 don
ors were scanned only on the day of superovulation and donors with < 1
0 follicles 3-8 mm in diameter were considered to have a dominant foll
icle, while donors with greater than or equal to 10 small follicles 3-
8 mm in diameter were classified as having no dominant follicle. In Ex
pt 2 donors superovulated (once a day for 4 days) in the absence of a
dominant follicle yielded more corpora lutea (15.5 +/- 2.5 versus 4.5
+/- 1.4, P < 0.01), ova and embryos (12.9 +/- 2.8 versus 1.2 +/- 0.4,
P < 0.01) and transferable embryos (7.8 +/- 2.5 versus 0.3 +/- 0.2, P
< 0.01) compared with donors treated in the presence of a dominant fol
licle. In Expt 3 donors superovulated (single s.c. injection) in the a
bsence of a dominant follicle yielded more corpora lutea (11.2 +/- 2.7
versus 1.9 +/- 0.8, P < 0.01), ova and embryos (9.5 +/- 2.7 versus 1.
2 +/- 0.6, P < 0.01) and transferable embryos (3.4 +/- 1.3 versus 0.3
+/- 0.2, P < 0.05) compared with donors treated in the presence of a d
ominant follicle. In Expt 4 donors were superovulated using one inject
ion of FSH per day for 4 days and scanned four times at intervals of 2
days. In the absence of a dominant follicle donors yielded more corpo
ra lutea (19.3 +/- 2.3 versus 7.7 +/- 1.6, P < 0.01), ova and embryos
(17.4 +/- 2.6 versus 5.1 +/- 1.4, P < 0.01) and transferable embryos (
10.3 +/- 2.2 versus 1.0 +/- 0.5, P < 0.01) than in the presence of a d
ominant follicle. In cows in which the dominant follicle had been aspi
rated under sonographical control 2 days before superovulation, the su
perovulatory response was similar to that in animals treated in the ab
sence of a dominant follicle, and was significantly enhanced compared
with animals superovulated in the presence of a dominant follicle (21.
6 +/- 2.2 corpora lutea, 18.7 +/- 12.7 ova and embryos, 10.1 +/- 1.5 t
ransferable embryos). The major conclusions from this investigation ar
e: (1) that the presence or absence of a dominant follicle can be dete
cted by a minimized ultrasound scanning schedule using the number of s
mall follicles as the major criterion; (2) the presence or absence of
a dominant follicle significantly affects superovulatory responses in
dairy cattle; and (3) ultrasound-guided follicular aspiration of the d
ominant follicle provides an accurate and reliable procedure to increa
se ovarian responses in dairy cattle possessing a dominant follicle.