BONE-MINERAL DENSITY IN NORMAL AND ASTHMATIC-CHILDREN

Citation
Ka. Kinberg et al., BONE-MINERAL DENSITY IN NORMAL AND ASTHMATIC-CHILDREN, Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 94(3), 1994, pp. 490-497
Citations number
45
Categorie Soggetti
Immunology,Allergy
ISSN journal
00916749
Volume
94
Issue
3
Year of publication
1994
Part
1
Pages
490 - 497
Database
ISI
SICI code
0091-6749(1994)94:3<490:BDINAA>2.0.ZU;2-C
Abstract
Background: The largest increase in bone mass occurs during childhood and adolescence. A subnormal bone mass is associated with increased ri sk of fracture. Bone mass is influenced by height, age, race, exercise , and stage of puberty. It is adversely affected by chronic disease st ates and corticosteroid use. We performed a cross-sectional study of b one density in children with moderate to severe asthma who were treate d with inhaled corticosteroids, inhaled cromolyn, oral corticosteroids , or a combination of these, and we compared them with normal children . Methods: A cross-sectional study of bone density, measured either by dual-photon or dual-energy absorptiometry was performed on 97 normal white and 30 asthmatic white children, aged 5 to 18. Average daily cal cium intake, height, weight, and Tanner stage were determined. The tot al daily and lifetime doses of inhaled corticosteroids in children wit h asthma were calculated. T tests, multiple regression, chi square ana lysis, and analysis of covariance were performed. Results: No signific ant difference in bone density was demonstrated between children with asthma and normal control subjects. No measure (including calcium inta ke, Tanner stage, daily or lifetime inhaled corticosteroid dose, or du ration of illness), except for height and age, provided a significant contribution to the explanation of bone density in children with asthm a. Conclusion: Children and adolescents with moderate to severe asthma , including those treated with inhaled corticosteroids, do not appear to have adversely affected bone mass. There was, however, the possibil ity of a type II error in this study because of the sample size.