Mm. Terkuile et al., AUTOGENIC TRAINING AND COGNITIVE SELF-HYPNOSIS FOR THE TREATMENT OF RECURRENT HEADACHES IN 3 DIFFERENT SUBJECT GROUPS, Pain, 58(3), 1994, pp. 331-340
The aims of this study were to (a) investigate the efficacy of autogen
ic training (AT) and cognitive self-hypnosis training (CSH) for the tr
eatment of chronic headaches in comparison with a waiting-list control
(WLC) condition, (b) investigate the influence of subject recruitment
on treatment outcome and (c) explore whether the level of hypnotizabi
lity is related to therapy outcome. Three different subjects groups (g
roup 1, patients (n = 58) who were referred by a neurological outpatie
nt clinic; group 2, members (n = 48) of the community who responded to
an advertisement in a newspaper; and group 3, students (n = 40) who r
esponded to an advertisement in a university newspaper) were allocated
at random to a therapy or WLC condition. During treatment, there was
a significant reduction in the Headache Index scores of the subjects i
n contrast with the controls. At post-treatment and follow-up almost n
o significant differences were observed between the 2 treatment condit
ions or the 3 referral sources regarding the Headache Index, psycholog
ical distress (SCL-90) scores and medication use. Follow-up measuremen
ts indicated that therapeutic improvement was maintained. In both trea
tment conditions, the high-hypnotizable subjects achieved a greater re
duction in headache pain at post-treatment and follow-up than did the
low-hypnotizable subjects. It is concluded that a relatively simple an
d highly structured relaxation technique for the treatment of chronic
headache subjects may be preferable to more complex cognitive hypnothe
rapeutic procedures, irrespective of the source of recruitment. The le
vel of hypnotic susceptibility seems to be a subject characteristic wh
ich is associated with a more favourable outcome in subjects treated w
ith AT or CSH.