AUTOGENIC TRAINING AND COGNITIVE SELF-HYPNOSIS FOR THE TREATMENT OF RECURRENT HEADACHES IN 3 DIFFERENT SUBJECT GROUPS

Citation
Mm. Terkuile et al., AUTOGENIC TRAINING AND COGNITIVE SELF-HYPNOSIS FOR THE TREATMENT OF RECURRENT HEADACHES IN 3 DIFFERENT SUBJECT GROUPS, Pain, 58(3), 1994, pp. 331-340
Citations number
30
Categorie Soggetti
Neurosciences
Journal title
PainACNP
ISSN journal
03043959
Volume
58
Issue
3
Year of publication
1994
Pages
331 - 340
Database
ISI
SICI code
0304-3959(1994)58:3<331:ATACSF>2.0.ZU;2-V
Abstract
The aims of this study were to (a) investigate the efficacy of autogen ic training (AT) and cognitive self-hypnosis training (CSH) for the tr eatment of chronic headaches in comparison with a waiting-list control (WLC) condition, (b) investigate the influence of subject recruitment on treatment outcome and (c) explore whether the level of hypnotizabi lity is related to therapy outcome. Three different subjects groups (g roup 1, patients (n = 58) who were referred by a neurological outpatie nt clinic; group 2, members (n = 48) of the community who responded to an advertisement in a newspaper; and group 3, students (n = 40) who r esponded to an advertisement in a university newspaper) were allocated at random to a therapy or WLC condition. During treatment, there was a significant reduction in the Headache Index scores of the subjects i n contrast with the controls. At post-treatment and follow-up almost n o significant differences were observed between the 2 treatment condit ions or the 3 referral sources regarding the Headache Index, psycholog ical distress (SCL-90) scores and medication use. Follow-up measuremen ts indicated that therapeutic improvement was maintained. In both trea tment conditions, the high-hypnotizable subjects achieved a greater re duction in headache pain at post-treatment and follow-up than did the low-hypnotizable subjects. It is concluded that a relatively simple an d highly structured relaxation technique for the treatment of chronic headache subjects may be preferable to more complex cognitive hypnothe rapeutic procedures, irrespective of the source of recruitment. The le vel of hypnotic susceptibility seems to be a subject characteristic wh ich is associated with a more favourable outcome in subjects treated w ith AT or CSH.