J. Grunberger et al., A NEW TECHNIQUE FOR MEASUREMENT OF CENTRA L NERVOUS ACTIVATION - FOURIER-ANALYSIS OF PUPILLARY OSCILLATIONS IN DEPRESSED-PATIENTS, Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift, 106(6), 1994, pp. 164-170
While the changes in pupillary size during wakefulness and drowsiness
are easy to understand, the origin of pupillary oscillations is quite
mysterious. Waves of spontaneous pupillary constriction and dilation a
ccompany periods of increasing sleepiness and spontaneous arousal. Low
enstein et al. (1963) demonstrated that in the dark, the pupils of you
ng normal alert subjects show waves of dilatation and contraction last
ing from about 4 to 40 s and measuring up to 0.5 mm. Furthermore. supe
rimposed fast and very extensive oscillations were observed The first
described oscillations seemed to reflect central nervous activation. T
herefore we analysed pupillary oscillations during the recording perio
d of static pupillometry (described by the authors in 1992) which last
ed for 25.6 s. Before calculating the Fourier analysis. blinks have to
be identified and eliminated by means of a new technique which is cal
led ,,smoothing''. Using the Fourier analysis, the spectrum was divide
d into 5 frequency bands (0.0-0.2; 0.21-0.4; 0.41-0.60; 0.61-0.8; 0.81
-1 Hz). We were also interested in the total spectrum. In order to dem
onstrate utilisation of the new technique. 146 male and female depress
ed patients (ICD-Diagnosis 296.1. 296.3, 296.1, 296.3 + 300, respectiv
ely, 300.4, 301.1, 296.1, 296.3 + 290, respectively), aged between 18
and 45 years. were investigated by means of pupillometry, followed by
analysis of pupillary oscillations. The whole group of depressive pati
ents who received antidepressive medication was compared with 64 healt
hy subjects of similar age to demonstrate differences in the frequency
bands. Concerning the amplitudes in the frequency bands of 0.0-0.2 Hz
, 0.2-0.4 Hz as well as 0.0-1.0 Hz (total spectrum), significant diffe
rences between depressed patients and normals were observed. reflectin
g reduced central activation in depressed patients. Furthermore, the d
ifferent depressive groups showed deactivation as compared with neurot
ics.