In this review, the impact of juvenile growth on subsequent recruitmen
t in flatfish is discussed. Recruitment is defined as the number of sp
ecimens of a specific year class that survives to attain sexual maturi
ty and joins the reproductive population. Theoretically, variability i
n growth rate can have an impact on recruitment either by means of siz
e-selective mortality during juvenile life and/or by means of size-dep
endent onset of maturation. In flatfish up to about 10 cm, growth depe
nds on size in such a way that variability in size within a population
increases during the first year of life, and decreases again in the s
ubsequent part of juvenile life. Temporal variability in size within l
ocal populations appears to be lower than spatial variability. Due to
the prolonged spawning period, and hence period of settlement, variabi
lity in size of juvenile flatfish increases with decreasing latitude.
As a consequence of these patterns, size-selective mortality appears t
o be mainly restricted to the O-group and to gain importance with decr
easing latitude. A literature search for field data yielded only a few
references suggesting size-selective mortality. In none of the studie
s was any relationship with ultimate recruitment studied or even sugge
sted. Size-dependent onset of maturation has been found in some flatfi
sh species, with slow-growing individuals or cohorts showing delayed m
aturation. Size-dependent onset of maturation has a clear effect on th
e level of recruitment. However, in the species studied, the main trai
ts in year-class strength still existed at the moment of recruitment t
o the reproducing stock. Size-dependent onset of maturation also appea
red to affect the year-to-year variability in recruitment, but differe
nt effects were observed among species. It is argued that both size-se
lective mortality and size-dependent onset of maturation are more like
ly to dampen than to generate variability in recruitment. The study of
the impact of juvenile growth on recruitment in flatfish is hampered
by the absence of long-term data sets on recruitment. Especially compa
rable series of (sub)tropical species and of populations covering the
total range of distribution of a species are lacking.