Objective: In an effort to decrease the probability of thrombosis at m
icrovascular anastomotic sites, researchers have examined techniques f
or decreasing the probability of thrombus formation at these sites. Id
entification of an appropriate animal model that is relatively easy to
perform, reliable, and reproducible was attempted in this study. The
goal of this study is to provide other investigators with a comparison
and critical appraisal of various thrombosis models allowing a more d
irected selection of models for their own research. Design: A prospect
ive, nonblinded animal study was designed that compared features of th
rombosis models previously described in the literature with each other
and with a new model (the ''tuck'' model), herein described. Main Out
come Measures: Ease of dissection, time to thrombosis, and other techn
ical details were recorded. Additionally, validation of clot histologi
c features in the tuck model was performed. Results: The inversion gra
ft models were found to be the most highly predictable and reliably th
rombogenic, although technically quite difficult. The tuck model produ
ces clot analogous to that produced clinically and is easy to perform,
although a predictable number of vessels will not thrombose. Conclusi
ons: The results of this study comparing various animal models of anas
tomotic thrombosis suggests that the tuck model is the model of choice
for most thrombus prevention studies. When predictability of thrombos
is is a critical factor, the inversion graft model should be chosen.