THE EFFECTS OF TOPICAL CORTICOSTEROIDS AND PLASMIN INHIBITORS ON REFRACTIVE OUTCOME, HAZE, AND VISUAL PERFORMANCE AFTER PHOTOREFRACTIVE KERATECTOMY - A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED, OBSERVER-MASKED STUDY
Dps. Obrart et al., THE EFFECTS OF TOPICAL CORTICOSTEROIDS AND PLASMIN INHIBITORS ON REFRACTIVE OUTCOME, HAZE, AND VISUAL PERFORMANCE AFTER PHOTOREFRACTIVE KERATECTOMY - A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED, OBSERVER-MASKED STUDY, Ophthalmology, 101(9), 1994, pp. 1565-1574
Background: This study of 86 patients with 12 months of follow-up was
designed to determine whether topical corticosteroids or plasmin inhib
itors have an effect on the outcome of photorefractive keratectomy. Me
thods: Patients were allocated randomly to either steroid (0.1% fluoro
metholone for 6 months), plasmin-inhibitor (aprotinin 40 IU/ml for 3 w
eeks), or control (no treatment) groups and underwent either -3.00- or
-6.00-diopter (D) corrections. Results: With -3.00-D corrections, the
mean refractive change was significantly greater at 3 and 6 months (P
< 0.05) in the steroid group compared with the control group. When st
eroids were discontinued, the difference became insignificant within 3
months. Similarly, with -6.00-D procedures the mean refractive change
was greater at 6 weeks and 3 and 6 months (P < 0.01), but the refract
ive change again became insignificant 3 months after stopping steroid
treatment. Four patients treated with steroids had a hyperopic shift g
reater than +2.00 D of that intended at 12 months. Similar overcorrect
ions were not noted in the other treatment groups. There were no diffe
rences in refractive outcome between the aprotinin and control groups
at any stage. With -6.00-D procedures, objective measurements of haze
were significantly greater in the aprotinin group compared with the co
ntrol group at 9 and 12 months (P < 0.05). With this exception, there
were no differences in haze, forward or backward scatter of light, bes
t-corrected visual acuity, or halo measurements between the groups. Co
nclusions: Corticosteroids can maintain a hyperopic shift during their
administration, but this effect is reversed on cessation of treatment
. Objective tests have shown that steroids have no effect on corneal h
aze or visual performance after PRK. There is no justification for rou
tinely submitting all patients to long-term steroid regimens and their
associated side effects. Treatment with aprotinin produced no benefic
ial effect on refractive outcome, and haze was greater in the -6.00-D
procedures. The concept of modulating the plasminogen activator/plasmi
n system to regulate wound healing after PRK is discussed.