A concern with questions of ''identity'' has characterized anthropolog
y in the 80's and early 90's. It is argued that this is due to a new p
ositioning of cultural relativism in postmodernist disguise - social,
historical, and comparative problems tend to be neglected by this rang
e of approaches, which emphasize subjectivity and ideology as their ma
in references. The author shows that such premises lead to a reductio
ad absurdum of scientific social anthropology and are untenable. Inste
ad, the advantages of discourses among experts for the scientific vali
dity of social anthropology are elaborated, specifically for a non-rel
ativist discipline of the social sciences.