Es. Rosengren et K. Simons, FAILED BANK RESOLUTION AND THE COLLATERAL CRUNCH - THE ADVANTAGES OF ADOPTING TRANSFERABLE PUTS, AREUEA journal, 22(1), 1994, pp. 135-147
Current methods of failed bank resolution are unnecessarily expensive
for tax-payers and impose substantial costs on borrowers at failed ban
ks. This situation is the result of distorted incentives imbedded in t
he standard contract between the government and acquirers of failed ba
nks, which result in more loan foreclosures than if the loan were held
by a well-capitalized bank. This paper proposes a modification to the
standard contract in the form of a transferable put, which would intr
oduce market-based incentives to the disposition of failed bank assets
.