FAILED BANK RESOLUTION AND THE COLLATERAL CRUNCH - THE ADVANTAGES OF ADOPTING TRANSFERABLE PUTS

Citation
Es. Rosengren et K. Simons, FAILED BANK RESOLUTION AND THE COLLATERAL CRUNCH - THE ADVANTAGES OF ADOPTING TRANSFERABLE PUTS, AREUEA journal, 22(1), 1994, pp. 135-147
Citations number
8
Categorie Soggetti
Planning & Development","Business Finance
Journal title
ISSN journal
02700484
Volume
22
Issue
1
Year of publication
1994
Pages
135 - 147
Database
ISI
SICI code
0270-0484(1994)22:1<135:FBRATC>2.0.ZU;2-#
Abstract
Current methods of failed bank resolution are unnecessarily expensive for tax-payers and impose substantial costs on borrowers at failed ban ks. This situation is the result of distorted incentives imbedded in t he standard contract between the government and acquirers of failed ba nks, which result in more loan foreclosures than if the loan were held by a well-capitalized bank. This paper proposes a modification to the standard contract in the form of a transferable put, which would intr oduce market-based incentives to the disposition of failed bank assets .