RISK-FACTORS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE OF NOSOCOMIAL MAXILLARY SINUSITISIN THE CRITICALLY ILL

Citation
Jj. Rouby et al., RISK-FACTORS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE OF NOSOCOMIAL MAXILLARY SINUSITISIN THE CRITICALLY ILL, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, 150(3), 1994, pp. 776-783
Citations number
30
Categorie Soggetti
Emergency Medicine & Critical Care","Respiratory System
ISSN journal
1073449X
Volume
150
Issue
3
Year of publication
1994
Pages
776 - 783
Database
ISI
SICI code
1073-449X(1994)150:3<776:RACRON>2.0.ZU;2-L
Abstract
The incidence of infectious maxillary sinusitis (IMS) and its clinical relevance was prospectively studied in 162 consecutive critically ill patients who were mechanically ventilated for a period longer than 7 d. All had a paranasal computed tomographic (CT) scan within 48 h of a dmission and were divided into three groups according to the radiologi c aspect of their maxillary sinuses: Group 1 = normal maxillary sinuse s (n = 40), Group 2 = maxillary mucosal thickening (n = 26), Group 3 = radiologic maxillary sinusitis (RMS) defined as the presence of an ai r fluid level and/or opacification of maxillary sinuses(n = 96). Group 1 patients were randomized between nasal and oral endotracheal intuba tion with a gastric intubation performed via the same route and had a second paranasal CT scan 7 d later. Endotracheal and gastric tubes wer e left in their original position in Group 2 patients and a second par anasal CT scan was performed 7 d later. All patients of Group 3 underw ent a transnasal puncture for bacteriologic analysis of maxillary sinu s content. Forty-five spontaneously breathing patients served as a con trol group. In all patients with RMS, the occurrence of bronchopneumon ia (BPN) was prospectively assessed for 7 d following the initial CT s can. Upon inclusion, only 25% of the patients had normal maxillary sin uses whereas all patients in the control group had normal paranasal CT scans. After 7 d, 46% of Group 2 patients had evidence of RMS. Risk f actors for RMS were nasal placement and duration of endotracheal and g astric intubation. In Group 1 patients, placement of endotracheal and gastric tubes to the oral route decreased the incidence of RMS from 95 .5% to 22.5% (p < 0.001). After transnasal puncture, only 38% of RMS w ere considered IMS. Qualitatively, 47% of the microorganisms isolated were gram-negative bacteria. Quantitatively, 60% of the isolated micro organisms were found in concentrations greater than or equal to 10(3) cfu/ml. BPN were more frequent in patients with IMS than in those with noninfectious maxillary sinusitis (67% versus 43%, p < 0.02). Followi ng maxillary drainage, signs of sepsis resolved in 47% of patients wit h IMS. In conclusion, IMS is an important focus of infection frequentl y associated with BPN in ventilated critically ill patients. Its incid ence can be markedly reduced by inserting endotracheal and gastric tub es via the oral route.