Fm. Burke et E. Lynch, GLASS POLYALKENOATE BOND STRENGTH TO DENTIN AFTER CHEMOMECHANICAL CARIES REMOVAL, Journal of dentistry, 22(5), 1994, pp. 283-291
The bond strength of a glass polyalkenoate cement after chemomechanica
l caries removal of dentine with or without the use of a conditioning
agent and the mode of bond failure using scanning electron microscopy
was examined. Forty extracted carious human teeth were divided into fo
ur groups of ten. Conventional caries removal was carried out on two g
roups and chemomechanical caries removal on the other two groups. Surf
ace conditioner was applied to the dentine in one conventionally treat
ed and one chemomechanically treated group. Glass polyalkenoate cement
was applied via a metal holder to the dentine. The samples were store
d for 7 days in a moist environment at 37 degrees C. The samples were
subjected to a shearing-type stress at a cross-head speed of 0.5 mm mi
n(-1). The mean bond strength for each group, in MPa (standard deviati
on), was: conventional caries removal alone 1.32 (0.51), conventional
caries removal and conditioner application 2.43 (0.47), chemomechanica
l caries removal alone 2.47 (0.99) and chemomechanical caries removal
and conditioner application 2.76 (0.96). Mean bond strengths for both
the chemomechanically treated groups and the conventionally treated gr
oup, coupled with the use of the conditioning agent, were significantl
y greater than for the conventionally treated groups alone at the 0.05
level. There was no significant difference between the chemomechanica
lly treated groups or the group conventionally treated with conditione
r application. SEM examination revealed a combination of cohesive and
adhesive bond failure. Different morphologies between the conventional
ly and chemomechanically treated surfaces were also evident.