I. Nir et al., QUANTITATIVE EFFECTS OF PELLETING ON PERFORMANCE, GASTROINTESTINAL-TRACT AND BEHAVIOR OF MEAT-TYPE CHICKENS, British Poultry Science, 35(4), 1994, pp. 589-602
1. In an attempt to quantify the effects of ''degree'' of pelleting, t
wo experiments were conducted. Diets were prepared by mixing together
a mash composed mainly of maize (experiment 1) or sorghum (experiment
2) with soft pellets, or soft pellets mixed with hard pellets. 2. The
pelleting degrees (PDs) were as follows: 0 mash; 0.5 mixture of soft p
ellets and mash 1 to 1; 1 soft pellets pelleted once; 1.5 mixture of s
oft and hard pellets 1 to 1; 2 hard pellets pelleted twice. 3. In expe
riment 2, the weight and length of the digestive organs were determine
d as well as digestive enzyme activities. In both experiments, the beh
aviour recorded was eating, standing, sitting and drinking. 4. Food in
take and body weight gain were related to the degree of pelleting in a
curvilinear manner. PD had a positive effect up to a peak (1 to 1.5 P
D), after which its effect decreased. Food efficiency was not related
to PD. In experiment 1, food efficiency of PDs 1 to 2 were superior to
PDs 0 to 0.5 and in experiment 2, PDs 1.5 to 2 were superior to PD 0.
5. The relative weight of the gizzard was reduced by pelleting, where
as pelleting increased the relative weight of abdominal fat. The conte
nt of the crop was not affected by PD, whereas that of the proventricu
lus was lowest in the PD 2 group. Gizzard content was inversely relate
d to PD. Pelleting reduced the length of the jejunum and ileum: which
were shortened by about 15% with PDs 1 to 2, as compared to PD 0. The
weight/length ratio of the jejunum and ileum tended to increase with i
ncreasing PD to a peak at PD 1.5, and to decrease thereafter. 6. Tryps
in activity in the pancreas and amylase activity in the intestinal con
tent were reduced by pelleting. 7. Chicks fed pelleted diets were less
active: they 'sat' more and spent less time eating than their mash-fe
d counterparts.