J. Gilliam et al., RELATIONSHIP OF THE PELVIC ANGLE TO THE SACRAL ANGLE - MEASUREMENT OFCLINICAL RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy, 20(4), 1994, pp. 193-199
There is a need to better document the reliability and validity of ass
essment measures used in physical therapy. Studies documenting the rel
iability of measurement of the pelvic angle and its relationship to sa
cral motion are presently inconclusive. The purpose of this study was
twofold. First, we wanted to determine the reliability and validity of
a goniometric measurement of the pelvic angle. We also wanted to test
the hypothesis that there is a relationship between the pelvic angle
and the sacral angle. Intertester and intratester reliability of gonio
metric pelvic angle measurements of 23 healthy young adults were exami
ned using three different raters. Radiographic measurements of the pel
vic and sacral angle using two raters and goniometric measurement of t
he pelvic angle using a single rater were taken from 15 patients with
low back pain who had been referred for X-rays. Intraclass correlation
coefficients (ICCs) of intratester reliability for goniometric measur
ements of the pelvic angle were .93, .96, and .96. The intertester rel
iability was .95. The ICCs for intratester reliability for radiologica
l measurements were .92 and .95 for the sacral angle and .98 for both
measurements of the pelvic angle. Intertester reliability coefficients
were .86 and .88, respectively. The Pearson correlation coefficients
for the goniometric and radiological measurements of the pelvic angle
were .85 and .68. A comparison of the radiological and goniometric mea
surements of the pelvic angle with the sacral angle demonstrated low a
verage correlations of .43 and .58, respectively. The results indicate
a high level of correlation between and within testers for goniometri
c measurements of the pelvic angle but only a fair correlation between
goniometric and radiological measurements of the pelvic angle. A poor
correlation was noted between the pelvic angle and the sacral angle.
We suggest further examination of measurements correlating the pelvic
angle and the sacral angle. Studies comparing several X-rays of the sa
me patient by examining the pelvis at different positions would better
demonstrate a relationship between the pelvic angle and the sacral an
gle.