Jf. Goodman, EARLY INTERVENTION FOR PRESCHOOLERS WITH DEVELOPMENTAL DELAYS - THE CASE FOR INCREASED CHILD COLLABORATION, Psychological reports, 75(1), 1994, pp. 479-496
In this article are analyzed the four following premises that explain
why early intervention programs for preschool children with mental ret
ardation (and other disabilities) have tended to adopt a teacher-direc
ted ''cultural transmission'' or remedial model of education, whereas
preschool programs for children without disabilities have generally pr
eferred a more child-directed ''developmental'' model. (1) The purpose
of early intervention is to accelerate and remediate, rather than sup
port, cognitive growth. (2) Learning and accountability are maximized
by specific instructional objectives written into educational plans ra
ther than by encouraging children's own constructivist efforts. (3) Ch
ildren with retardation are defective, not just slow but otherwise nor
mal and so require extensive adult direction. (4) Research findings ar
e favorable rather than ambiguous towards demonstrating the effectiven
ess of existing instructional methods. The four premises are reviewed
and critiqued. It is concluded that there is sufficient doubt about th
e cultural transmission remedial model to justify further expansion of
the developmental approach in early intervention programs, at least f
or some children in some areas. Changes in attitudes and practices tha
t such an expansion would entail are discussed.