The current treatment for deep vein thrombosis is a 5- to 10-day cours
e of heparin followed by 3 to 6 months of oral anticoagulants. Both he
parin and oral anticoagulants present a high inter- and intra-individu
al variability and require individualisation and monitoring of their d
osage. The pharmacokinetic properties of heparin have been difficult t
o assess through the radiolabelling procedures typically used for many
other drugs, This is partially a result of the heterogeneous nature o
f heparin. Thus, the pharmacokinetics of heparin are expressed in term
s of its pharmacodynamic activity, Improved coagulation test methodolo
gy coupled with the incorporation of patient factors such as bodyweigh
t, height, baseline coagulation status, pretreatment heparin sensitivi
ty and heparin concentrations, can be used to improve the accuracy of
heparin dosage determination, Computer-based systems are now available
to assist clinicians in quantitating dosage requirements, estimating
bleeding risks, and storing patient dose-response relationships for fu
ture therapy monitoring. Low molecular weight heparin products might i
mprove our ability to control anticoagulant therapy because drug conce
ntration, as well as the effect on the clotting system, will be more p
redictable in patients receiving these products, In addition, low mole
cular weight heparins produce a more consistent, predictable anticoagu
lant response, and clinicians have a new pharmacological tool which ma
y readily lend itself to patient-controlled, home-based anticoagulant
pharmacotherapy. Where pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics could con
tribute to the optimisation of warfarin treatment is in the initiation
of treatment, the estimation of the dosage required, the methods for
drug monitoring, the assessment of unusual responses and the avoidance
of drug interactions. Traditional pharmacokinetic methods have limite
d applicability to the optimisation of warfarin therapy because there
is no direct relationship between drug concentration and therapeutic e
ffect. However, a variety of simple or sophisticated computer-assisted
methods have been developed to help clinicians in individualising and
monitoring warfarin treatment. New therapeutic approaches, such as di
rect thrombin inhibitors and thrombolytic agents, could overcome some
limitations of the standard heparin plus oral anticoagulation therapy.