PALEOGEOGRAPHIC AND PALEOTECTONIC IMPLICATIONS OF CLAY MINERAL DISTRIBUTION IN LATE JURASSIC EARLY CRETACEOUS SEDIMENTS OF THE PINDOS-OLONOS AND BEOTIAN BASINS, GREECE
F. Thiebault et al., PALEOGEOGRAPHIC AND PALEOTECTONIC IMPLICATIONS OF CLAY MINERAL DISTRIBUTION IN LATE JURASSIC EARLY CRETACEOUS SEDIMENTS OF THE PINDOS-OLONOS AND BEOTIAN BASINS, GREECE, Palaeogeography, palaeoclimatology, palaeoecology, 108(1-2), 1994, pp. 23-40
A new method is proposed for solving the controversial problem of the
location of oceanic areas from which the Pindos and Othrys ophiolites
originated. Assuming that clay fractions, quickly disseminated over la
rge areas, may be reliable markers of erosional processes, we studied
these fractions in sediments from two ''external'' basins (Pindos-Olon
os and Beotian) located between the main carbonate platforms of the Gr
eek Hellenids. Chronologically, two different clay associations can be
distinguished in the sedimentary sequences of the basins. The lower o
ne is dominated by illite and subregular illite-smectite mixed-layers
and poor in Mg, Ni and Cr; this association is consistent with common
continental sources. The upper one, appearing in late Tithonian synchr
oneously in both basins, consists of trioctahedral smectite (saponite
type) enriched in Fe, Mg, Ni and Cr; they are considered to be derived
from weathered ophiolites. Thus, the beginning of the ophiolite detri
tal sedimentation, accepted as being middle to late Bathonian in the b
asinal sequences of the Maliac or Othrys zone from Hydra or lower-midd
le Oxfordian in all the internal units in the Argolis Peninsula, is mu
ch younger (late Tithonian) in the external basins. Such a diachronism
is not consistent with a model postulating initial ophiolite displace
ments within the Pindos-Olonos basin by late Jurassic time. It suggest
s that a platform was acting as a barrier between the site of the ophi
olite first intra-oceanic deformation and the ''external'' basins. Thi
s barrier cannot be the Parnassuss platform that kept subsiding in ner
itic environments until late Cretaceous inside the ''external'' basins
; it is likely to be the Pelagonian platform, positively known to have
been submerged during the Tithonian. Consequently, we conclude that t
here was no genetic relationships between the ''external'' basins (Pin
dos-Olonos basin in a broad sense) and the ''Pindos ophiolites'' of wh
ich the zone of origin is to be located on the opposite eastern ''inte
rnal'' side of the Pelagonian platform.