This article places the definition of the role of the police force, pu
t forward by the American sociologist Egon Bittner, under critical exa
mination. The role is defined as ''a mechanism used to distribute non-
negotiable coercive force with intuitive understanding of the requirem
ents in a given situation''. Firstly, it is shown that this definition
, under the influence of ethnomethodology, has gained status as a para
digm in police sociology. Then, it is pointed out that Bittner defines
the police force in terms of its capacity to use force rather than in
terms of its actual resorting to coercive measures. The urgent nature
of the situations to which the police is required to react according
to this theory is then discussed, along with the characteristics of po
lice intervention. Finally, the article criticizes Bittner's proposals
and points out that they are for the most part normative, and therefo
re, cannot be validated empirically, too restrictive to take into acco
unt the majority of police actions and lastly incorrect on a number of
points, such as police monopoly as regards physical strength, its obl
igation to deal in certain ways, and in its relation to law.