J. Koglin et al., ANTIADRENERGIC EFFECT OF CARBACHOL BUT NOT OF ADENOSINE ON CONTRACTILITY IN THE INTACT HUMAN VENTRICLE IN-VIVO, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 23(3), 1994, pp. 678-683
Objectives. The purpose of this study was to investigate the antiadren
ergic effects of adenosine and carbachol on beta-adrenoceptor-stimulat
ed human ventricular contractility in vivo. In addition, the antiadren
ergic effects of adenosine and carbachol were compared in vitro. Backg
round. Adenosine is reported to exhibit an antiadrenergic negative ino
tropic response in the beta-adrenergic-stimulated ventricular myocardi
um in vitro. The effect of adenosine is similar to the antiadrenergic
effect of m-cholinoceptor stimulation in vitro. Methods. The inotropic
response in vivo was assessed in seven healthy volunteers by M-mode e
chocardiography and simultaneous blood pressure monitoring. It was cal
culated as the increase in the rate-corrected velocity of circumferent
ial fiber shortening and in the systolic pressure/dimension ratio. All
volunteers received pretreatment with 450 mg of dipyridamole/day for
48 h. In addition, the effects of adenosine and carbachol in the prese
nce of 0.03 mu mol/liter of isoproterenol on cumulative concentration-
response curves of isolated, electrically driven human ventricular mus
cle strips were compared in vitro (n = 13). Results. The positive inot
ropic response to continuous infusion of 20 ng/kg per min of isoproter
enol (increase of rate-corrected velocity of circumferential fiber sho
rtening [10.2 +/- 2.1% x root beats/min per ms] and increase of systol
ic pressure/dimension ratio 1.09 +/- 0.3 mm Hg/mm) was significantly (
p < 0.01) reduced by 3.6 mu g/kg body weight of intravenous carbachol
(4.2 +/- 1.2% x root beats/min per ms, 0.21 +/- 0.18 mm Hg/mm) but not
by 50 mu g/kg of intravenous adenosine (8.2 +/- 3.1% x root beats/min
per ms, 1.35 +/- 0.42 mm Hg/mm), although adenosine induced a signifi
cant negative dromotropic effect. In vitro comparison of force of cont
raction with cumulative concentration-response curves in the presence
of 0.03 mu mol/liter of isoproterenol demonstrated an EC(50) value (co
ncentration producing half maximal effect) for adenosine 466 times hig
her than that for carbachol (65.3 vs. 0.14 mu mol/liter, p < 0.001). C
onclusions. In contrast to carbachol, adenosine does not attenuate the
catecholamine induced increase in contractility in the human ventricl
e in vivo. These differences between the A(1)adenosine receptor- and m
-cholinoceptor-mediated effects could be due to fewer A(1)-adenosine r
eceptors or a less efficient receptor-effector coupling, or both.