A. Iniguez et al., EARLY ANGIOGRAPHIC CHANGES OF SIDE BRANCHES ARISING FROM A PALMAZ-SCHATZ STENTED CORONARY SEGMENT - RESULTS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 23(4), 1994, pp. 911-915
Objectives. The purpose of this study was to assess the effects and cl
inical implications of Palmaz-Schatz stent implantation on coronary bl
ood flow in side branches arising from a stented coronary artery segme
nt. Background. The occlusion of a side branch is a well defined risk
after balloon angioplasty. However, the impact of stenting on the coro
nary flow in side branches arising within the stented segment is unkno
wn. Methods. Forty six stented coronary artery segments with 79 side b
ranches emerging from the stented segment were analyzed. Angiographic
studies were performed before angioplasty, after balloon dilation, imm
ediately after stenting and 24 h later. Side branches were classified
as follows: type A (greater than or equal to 1 mm in diameter, with os
tial narrowing), type B (greater than or equal to 1 mm in diameter, wi
thout ostial narrowing), type C (<1 mm in diameter, with ostial narrow
ing) and type D (<1 mm in diameter, without ostial narrowing). Quantit
ative angiography was used to assess the diameter of the side branches
. Results. Stents were implanted electively in lesions with restenosis
(41 stents, 89%) or with a suboptimal result after angioplasty (5 ste
nts, 11%). Nine side branches (11%) were type A, 25 (32%) type B, 7 (9
%) type C and 38 (48%) type D. At baseline, 68 side branches had Throm
bolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) trial flow grade 3; 10 had gra
de 2; and 1 had grade 1. Flow worsened (TIMI grade greater than or equ
al to 1) in six side branches (8%) after balloon dilation and in four
side branches (5%) after stenting. One additional side branch (1%) was
occluded at 24 h. Of the 34 side branches greater than or equal to 1
mm in diameter (mean diameter 1.5 +/- 0.3 mm), 2 (6%) had flow impairm
ent after stenting. Three patients experienced transient angina, but n
o acute myocardial infarction occurred as a result of a side branch oc
clusion. Conclusions. Coronary artery stenting does not modify anterog
rade flow in 90% of side branches. Coronary flow is reduced after sten
ting in a few branches, but this does not appear to have major clinica
l relevance.