IMPAIRED ENDOTHELIUM-DEPENDENT VASODILATION IN PATIENTS WITH ESSENTIAL-HYPERTENSION - EVIDENCE THAT THE ABNORMALITY IS NOT AT THE MUSCARINIC RECEPTOR LEVEL

Citation
Ja. Panza et al., IMPAIRED ENDOTHELIUM-DEPENDENT VASODILATION IN PATIENTS WITH ESSENTIAL-HYPERTENSION - EVIDENCE THAT THE ABNORMALITY IS NOT AT THE MUSCARINIC RECEPTOR LEVEL, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 23(7), 1994, pp. 1610-1616
Citations number
27
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiac & Cardiovascular System
ISSN journal
07351097
Volume
23
Issue
7
Year of publication
1994
Pages
1610 - 1616
Database
ISI
SICI code
0735-1097(1994)23:7<1610:IEVIPW>2.0.ZU;2-S
Abstract
Objectives. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the imp aired endothelium dependent vasodilation of hypertensive patients is r elated to a specific defect of the muscarinic receptor or to a broader abnormality of the vascular endothelium. Background. Patients with es sential hypertension have abnormal endothelium dependent vasodilator r esponse to acetylcholine. However, whether this results from an isolat ed dysfunction of the endothelial cell muscarinic receptor is unknown. Methods. The responses of the forearm vasculature to acetyl choline a nd substance P (endothelium dependent agents acting on different recep tors) and to sodium nitroprusside (a direct dilator of vascular smooth muscle) were studied in eight hypertensive patients (six men, two wom en; mean age [+/-SD] 50 +/- 12 years) and eight normal control subject s (four men, four women; mean age 49 +/- 9 years). To determine the ni tric oxide contribution to substance P-induced vasodilation, the vascu lar responses to substance P were also measured after inhibition of ni tric oxide synthesis with N-G-monomethyl-L-arginine. Drugs were infuse d into the brachial artery, and forearm blood flow was measured by str ain gauge plethysmography. Results. The response to acetylcholine was significantly blunted in hypertensive patients (highest blood now [mea n +/- SD] 8.4 +/- 4 vs. 13.8 +/- 4 ml/min per 100 mi in control subjec ts, p < 0.03). Similarly, the vasodilator effect of substance P was si gnificantly reduced in hypertensive patients (highest blood flow [mean +/- SD] 8.8 +/- 4 vs. 13.9 +/- 4 ml/min per 100 mi in control subject s, p < 0.03). A significant correlation was found between the maximal blood Bow with acetylcholine and that with substance P (r = 0.68, p < 0.004). The vasodilator response to sodium nitroprusside was similar i n patients and control subjects, The nitric oxide contribution to subs tance P-induced vasodilation was reduced in hypertensive patients, suc h that the responses to substance P measured during infusion of N-G-mo nomethyl L arginine were not significantly different between the two g roups. Conclusions. These findings indicate that the endothelial abnor mality of patients with essential hypertension is not restricted to th e muscarinic cell receptor.