Mh. Lehmann et al., T-WAVE HUMPS AS A POTENTIAL ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHIC MARKER OF THE LONG QT SYNDROME, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 24(3), 1994, pp. 746-754
Objectives. This study attempted to determine the prevalence and elect
rocardiographic (ECG) lead distribution of T wave ''humps'' (T2, after
an initial T wave peak, T1) among families with long QT syndrome and
control subjects. Background. T wave abnormalities have been suggested
as another facet of familiar long QT syndrome, in addition to prolong
ation of the rate-corrected QT interval (QTc), that might aid in the d
iagnosis of affected subjects. Methods. The ECGs from 254 members of 1
3 families with long QT syndrome (each with two to four generations of
affected members) and from 2,948 healthy control subjects (age greate
r than or equal to 16 years, QTc interval 0.39 to 0.46 s) were collect
ed and analyzed. Tracings from families with long QT syndrome were rea
d without knowledge of QTc interval or family member status (210 blood
relatives and 44 spouses). Results. We found that T2 was present in 5
3%, 27% and 5% of blood relatives with a ''prolonged'' (greater than o
r equal to 0.47 s), ''borderline'' (0.42 to 0.46 s) and ''normal'' (le
ss than or equal to 0.41 s) QTc interval, respectively (p < 0.0001), b
ut in only 5% and 0% of spouses with a borderline and normal QTc inter
val, respectively (p = 0.06 vs. blood relatives). Among blood relative
s with T2, the mean [+/-SD] maximal T1T2 interval was 0.10 +/- 0.03 s
and correlated with the QTc interval (p < 0.01); a completely distinct
U wave was seen in 23%. T2 was confined to leads V-2 and V-3 in 10%,
whereas V-4, V-5, V-6 or a limb lead was involved in 90% of blood rela
tives with T2. Among blood relatives with a borderline QTc interval, 5
0% of those with versus 20% of those without major symptoms manifested
T2 in at least one left precordial or limb lead (p = 0.05). A T2 ampl
itude >1 mm (grade III) was observed, respectively, in 19%, 6% and 0%
of blood relatives with a prolonged, borderline and normal QTc interva
l with T2 in at least one left precordial or limb lead. Among the 2,94
8 control subjects, 0.6% exhibited T2 confined to leads V-2 and V-3, a
nd 0.9% had T2 involving one or more left precordial lend (but none of
the limb leads). Among 37 asymptomatic adult blood relatives with QTc
intervals 0.42 to 0.46 s, T2 was found in left precordial or limb lea
ds in 9 (24%; 5 with limb lead involvement) versus only 1.9% of contro
l subjects with a borderline QTc interval (p < 0.0001). Conclusions. T
hese findings are consistent with the hypothesis that in families with
long QT syndrome, T wave humps involving left precordial or (especial
ly) limb leads, even among asymptomatic blood relatives with a borderl
ine QTc interval, suggest the presence of the long QT syndrome trait.