R. Arora et al., PERCUTANEOUS TRANSATRIAL MITRAL COMMISSUROTOMY - IMMEDIATE AND INTERMEDIATE RESULTS, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 23(6), 1994, pp. 1327-1332
Objectives. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the immediate an
d follow up results of percutaneous transatrial mitral commissurotomy
in 600 patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis. Background. Percutaneo
us transatrial mitral commissurotomy has emerged as an effective nonsu
rgical technique for patients with symptomatic mitral stenosis. Severa
l studies have shown that the immediate results are comparable to clos
ed and open mitral valvotomy. Methods. Percutaneous transatrial mitral
commissurotomy was performed in 600 patients with rheumatic mitral st
enosis by the double-balloon (290 patients [48.3%]) and flow-guided In
oue balloon (310 patients [51.7%]) techniques. There were 154 male (25
.6%) and 446 female (77.4%) patients with a mean [+/-SD] age of 27 +/-
8 years (range 8 to 60). Atrial fibrillation was present in 26 patien
ts (4.3%), mitral regurgitation less than or equal to grade 2 in 62 (1
0.3%) and densely calcific valve in 12 (2%). All patients had clinical
and echocardiographic (two-dimensional, continuous wave Doppler, colo
r flow imaging) follow-up at 3-month intervals. Results. Percutaneous
transatrial mitral commissurotomy was successful in 589 patients (98.1
%), and optimal commissurotomy was achieved in 562 (93.6%), with an in
crease in mitral valve area from (mean +/- SD) 0.75 +/- 0.18 to 2.2 +/
- 0.38 cm(2) (p < 0.001) and a decrease in transmitral end-diastolic g
radient from 27.3 +/- 6.1 to 3.8 +/- 4.2 mm Hg (p < 0.001). Mitral reg
urgitation developed or increased in 208 patients (34.6%). Six patient
s (1%) with mitral regurgitation required mitral valve replacement. Ca
rdiac tamponade occurred in 8 patients (1.3%). Six patients (1%) died.
Restenosis developed in 10 patients (1.7%) during a mean follow up pe
riod of 37 +/- 8 months (range 6 to 66). Conclusions. Percutaneous tra
nsatrial mitral commissurotomy is an effective, safe procedure with gr
atifying intermediate results. It should be considered the treatment o
f choice for rheumatic mitral stenosis.