Economic liberalism has assumed a virtually uncontested position in de
velopment studies, but the experiences of less developed countries bel
ie the uniform assumptions about human behavior and economic processes
of the neoclassical developmentalist paradigm. Market reforms have pr
oduced widely divergent results. The experiences of Iraq and Saudi Ara
bia, two most similar cases, demonstrate the importance of political c
oalitions and institutions for different policy outcomes. Historical a
nalysis is useful in discovering the relative weight of political coal
itions, institutional structures, and policy in determining the outcom
es of economic liberalization programs. It highlights the contingent n
ature of radical economic restructuring and exposes some of the reason
s why the social, institutional, and political prerequisites for marke
t economies do not exist in the developing world.