Hc. Wiesenfeld et al., DIAGNOSIS OF MALE CHLAMYDIA-TRACHOMATIS URETHRITIS BY POLYMERASE CHAIN-REACTION, Sexually transmitted diseases, 21(5), 1994, pp. 268-271
Background and Objectives: A quick and highly sensitive diagnostic tes
t would be valuable in the diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis. Goal of
this Study: We compared a new polymerase chain reaction (PCR) techniq
ue to Chlamydiazyme (Abbott, North Chicago, IL) in the detection of ma
le chlamydial urethritis, and evaluated the performance of PCR on urin
e samples. Study Design: Urethral samples for analysis by PCR and Chla
mydiazyme were obtained from 474 unselected patients attending a sexua
lly transmitted diseases (STD) clinic. Urine samples were analyzed by
PCR from 362 of these patients. Results: Twenty seven (5.7%) urethral
samples were positive by Chlamydiazyme, while 64 (13.5%) were positive
by PCR. After resolution of discrepant results, the sensitivity of PC
R on urethral swabs was 98.4% and the specificity was 99.0%, with posi
tive and negative predictive values of 93.8% and 99.8%, respectively.
These same measures for Chlamydiazyme were 43.5%, 100%, 100%, and 92.2
%, respectively. The sensitivity of PCR on urine samples was 87.1%, th
e specificity was 98.0%, and the positive and negative predictive valu
es were 90.0% and 97.4%,respectively. Conclusions: This PCR test is mo
re sensitive than Chlamydiazyme in detecting male urethral chlamydial
infections in an STD clinic population, and appears to be equally effi
cacious on urethral swabs and urine samples.