Sm. Ramin et al., COMPARISON OF PROPHYLACTIC ANGIOTENSIN-II VERSUS EPHEDRINE INFUSION FOR PREVENTION OF MATERNAL HYPOTENSION DURING SPINAL-ANESTHESIA, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 171(3), 1994, pp. 734-739
OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to study the efficacy of ephedrine versus a
ngiotensin II prophylactic infusions to counter maternal hypotension t
hat occurs during spinal anesthesia at cesarean delivery. STUDY DESIGN
: Healthy pregnant women undergoing elective repeat cesarean delivery
at term with spinal anesthesia were randomized either to a control gro
up (n = 10) or to one of two prophylactic infusion groups: angiotensin
II (n = 10) or ephedrine (n = 10). Prophylactic infusions were titrat
ed to a maternal diastolic blood pressure 0 to 10 mm Hg above baseline
. Maternal and fetal blood samples for angiotensin II levels and acid-
base status were obtained. Student's t test, chi(2), and analysis of v
ariance were used. RESULTS: Mean arterial pressures were maintained af
ter spinal anesthesia in the ephedrine and angiotensin II groups but d
ecreased (p < 0.05) in the control group. Maternal angiotensin II leve
ls rose with angiotensin II infusions but were unaltered in the other
groups. Umbilical artery and vein angiotensin II levels were unaltered
by angiotensin II infusions. Mean umbilical artery blood pH was lower
(p < 0.05) in the ephedrine group than in the angiotensin II and cont
rol groups. CONCLUSIONS: In the healthy term fetus there is an advanta
ge in using angiotensin II to maintain maternal blood pressure during
regional anesthesia.