COMPARISON OF PROPHYLACTIC ANGIOTENSIN-II VERSUS EPHEDRINE INFUSION FOR PREVENTION OF MATERNAL HYPOTENSION DURING SPINAL-ANESTHESIA

Citation
Sm. Ramin et al., COMPARISON OF PROPHYLACTIC ANGIOTENSIN-II VERSUS EPHEDRINE INFUSION FOR PREVENTION OF MATERNAL HYPOTENSION DURING SPINAL-ANESTHESIA, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 171(3), 1994, pp. 734-739
Citations number
25
Categorie Soggetti
Obsetric & Gynecology
ISSN journal
00029378
Volume
171
Issue
3
Year of publication
1994
Pages
734 - 739
Database
ISI
SICI code
0002-9378(1994)171:3<734:COPAVE>2.0.ZU;2-B
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to study the efficacy of ephedrine versus a ngiotensin II prophylactic infusions to counter maternal hypotension t hat occurs during spinal anesthesia at cesarean delivery. STUDY DESIGN : Healthy pregnant women undergoing elective repeat cesarean delivery at term with spinal anesthesia were randomized either to a control gro up (n = 10) or to one of two prophylactic infusion groups: angiotensin II (n = 10) or ephedrine (n = 10). Prophylactic infusions were titrat ed to a maternal diastolic blood pressure 0 to 10 mm Hg above baseline . Maternal and fetal blood samples for angiotensin II levels and acid- base status were obtained. Student's t test, chi(2), and analysis of v ariance were used. RESULTS: Mean arterial pressures were maintained af ter spinal anesthesia in the ephedrine and angiotensin II groups but d ecreased (p < 0.05) in the control group. Maternal angiotensin II leve ls rose with angiotensin II infusions but were unaltered in the other groups. Umbilical artery and vein angiotensin II levels were unaltered by angiotensin II infusions. Mean umbilical artery blood pH was lower (p < 0.05) in the ephedrine group than in the angiotensin II and cont rol groups. CONCLUSIONS: In the healthy term fetus there is an advanta ge in using angiotensin II to maintain maternal blood pressure during regional anesthesia.