C. Hillvenning et al., SUBUNIT-DEPENDENT INTERACTION OF THE GENERAL ANESTHETIC ETOMIDATE WITH THE GAMMA-AMINOBUTYRIC-ACID TYPE-A RECEPTOR, British Journal of Pharmacology, 120(5), 1997, pp. 749-756
1 The GABA modulating and GABA-mimetic actions of the general anaesthe
tic etomidate were examined in voltage-clamp recordings performed on X
enopus laevis oocytes induced, by cRNA injection, to express human rec
ombinant gamma-aminobutyric acid(A) (GABA(A)) receptor subunits. 2 Cur
rents mediated by recombinant receptors with the ternary subunit compo
sition alpha(x) beta(y) gamma(2L) (where x=1,2,3 or 6 and y=1 or 2), i
n response to GABA applied at the appropriate EC(10), were enhanced by
etomidate in a manner that was dependent upon the identity of both th
e alpha and beta subunit isoforms. 3 For the beta(2)-subunit containin
g receptors tested, the EC(50) for the potentiation of GABA-evoked cur
rents by etomidate (range 0.6 to 1.2 mu M) was little affected by the
nature of the alpha subunit present within the hetero-oligomeric compl
ex. However, replacement of the beta(2) by the beta(1) subunit produce
d a 9-12 fold increase in the etomidate EC(50) (6 to 11 mu M) for all
alpha-isoforms tested. 4 For alpha(1), alpha(2) and alpha(6), but not
alpha(3)-subunit containing receptors, the maximal potentiation of GAB
A-evoked currents by etomidate was greater for beta(2)- than for beta(
1)-subunit containing receptors. This was most clearly exemplified by
receptors composed of alpha(6) beta(1) gamma(2L) compared to alpha(6)
beta(2) gamma(2L) subunits, where a maximally effective concentration
of etomidate potentiated currents evoked by GABA at EC(50) to 28+/-2%
and 169+/-4% of the maximal GABA response, respectively. 5 For alpha(1
) subunit-containing receptors, the potency and maximal potentiating e
ffect of either pentobarbitone or propofol was essentially unaffected
by the beta subunit isoform contained within the receptor complex. The
potency of the anaesthetic neurosteroid 5 alpha-pregnan-3 alpha-ol-20
-one was marginally higher for beta(1) rather than the beta(2) subunit
-containing receptor, although its maximal effect was similar at the t
wo receptor isoforms. 6 The GABA-mimetic action of etomidate was suppo
rted by beta(2)- but not beta(1)-subunit containing receptors, whereas
that of pentobarbitone or propofol was evident with either beta isofo
rm. For beta(2)-subunit containing receptors, both the agonist EC(50)
and the maximal current produced by etomidate were additionally influe
nced by the alpha isoform. 7 It is concluded that the subtype of beta-
subunit influences the potency with which etomidate potentiates GABA-e
voked currents and that the beta isoform is a crucial determinant of t
he GABA-mimetic activity of this compound. The nature of the alpha-sub
unit also impacts upon the maximal potentiation and activation that th
e compound may elicit. Such pronounced influences may aid the identifi
cation of the site that recognises etomidate. More generally, these re
sults provide a clear example of structural specificity in anaesthetic
action.