Na. Brown et al., BLOCK OF HUMAN VOLTAGE-SENSITIVE NA-SY5Y CELLS BY LIFARIZINE( CURRENTS IN DIFFERENTIATED SH), British Journal of Pharmacology, 113(2), 1994, pp. 600-606
1 The ability of lifarizine (RS-87476) to block human voltage Na+ chan
nel currents was studied by use of whole cell patch clamp recording fr
om differentiated neuroblastoma cells (SH-SY5Y). 2. The Na+ conductanc
e in differentiated SH-SY5Y cells (24.0 +/- 2.4 nS, n = 11) was half-m
aximally activated by 10 ms depolarizations to - 37 +/- 2 mV and was h
alf-maximally inactivated by predepolarizing pulses of 200 ms duration
to - 86 +/- 3 mV (n = 11). 3 At low stimulus frequencies (0.1 to 0.33
Hz) voltage-dependent sodium currents were completely blocked, in a c
oncentration-dependent manner, by extracellular application of either
tetrodotoxin (EC(50) = 4 +/- 1 nM, n = 12) or by lifarizine (EC(50) =
783 +/- 67 nM, n = 9). The onset of block by lifarizine (tau = 91 +/-
14 s at 10 mu M) was considerably slower than that of tetrodotoxin (ta
u = 16 +/- 3 s at 100 nM). 4 Lifarizine (1 mu M) reduced the peak sodi
um conductance in each cell (from 26.4 +/- 2.0 nS to 15.1 +/- 2.7 nS,
n = 4) without changing the macroscopic kinetics of sodium current act
ivation or inactivation (V1/2 = - 35 +/- 1 mV and - 87 +/- 4 mV respec
tively, n = 4). Similarly, lifarizine (1 mu M) did not affect the reve
rsal potential of the macroscopic sodium current (+ 14 +/- 5 mV in con
trol and + 16 +/- 2 mV in 1 mu M lifarizine; n = 4) or reactivation ti
me-constant (tau = 14.0 +/- 4.4 ms). 5 Block of the sodium channel ope
n state by tetrodotoxin (30 nM) did not prevent the inhibition caused
by a subsequent application of lifarizine (3 mu M). In contrast the de
pression caused by lifarizine was readily reversible after pretreatmen
t of cells with the local anaesthetic, lignocaine (10 mM). 6 These dat
a demonstrate that lifarizine is a use- and voltage-dependent antagoni
st of human voltage-sensitive sodium currents. The slow kinetics and p
harmacology of the block by lifarizine indicate that access of this dr
ug to the channel is more restricted than that of tetrodotoxin and may
involve an allosteric site or state of the channel that is also regul
ated by local anaesthetics.